Paper vs. Electronic

There was an interesting article a few weeks ago in the New York Times, about electronic tools for note-taking: Bringing Order to the Chaos of Notes:

MODERN life is a mess of notes, a tangle of countless scraps of information that we accumulate during our waking hours. In the morning, you attend a meeting with the boss and jot down everything she says. Later, you get a call from the vet and transcribe results from your dog’s lab tests. At lunch, a friend gives you the name of a Mexican place he says you’ve got to try. And then there are the to-do lists, grocery lists, recipes and all those brilliant ideas for screenplays you get while taking a shower.

The piles of notes are even more ungainly if you’re in a profession that demands constant transcription — if you’re a student, lawyer, journalist or executive assistant, a job in which every utterance should be recorded, archived and made searchable.

The puzzle is where to write all this stuff down. Computers have revolutionized how we manage information, but for many years they’ve offered meager help for that most pedestrian of paper-based tasks — saving all the ephemeral data that streams into your life.

Most people reading this blog are probably quite happy to solve this problem by buying more notebooks to stick those paper bits in! But if you are interested in using electronic solutions too, here are some programs mentioned in the article.

Evernote
OneNote
NoteBook
Yojimbo
Together

The writer does acknowledge that pen and paper still win sometimes:

…physical notebooks have their advantages. They’re highly portable and extremely flexible; they let you draw, scribble in shorthand and you can curl up the corner of a page to remember something important.

But pen and paper have their limitations. You can’t search paper, and you can’t easily organize a stack of notes into a meaningful collection without retyping them first. Most important, pen and paper don’t last. Notebooks are hard to keep safe and secure, and if you move apartments or offices, you’re bound to lose something important. Paper notes have a habit of going through the wash and coming out as papier-mâché.

Your electronic data, meanwhile, is replicated on the Web and on all your machines, and will probably be safe for years. This can make all the difference: With computerized notes, your daily musings are permanent. In time, they could add up to something grand.

Like most people, I’ve found that a combination of electronic and paper makes the most sense for me. I love keeping my calendar and contacts in Outlook, and I use it for to-dos and many notes related to my work and personal life also. But I still keep a paper journal and use my notebook to jot down personal to-dos, ideas, lists, doodles, etc., and I can’t imagine any electronic invention that would change that.

3 thoughts on “Paper vs. Electronic”

  1. After visiting the Galileo exhibit and gazing at the manuscripts that are a couple hundred years old, still clearly readable, and conveying not only information but a sense of the writer, I challenge the idea “Your electronic data, meanwhile, is replicated on the Web and on all your machines, and will probably be safe for years. This can make all the difference: With computerized notes, your daily musings are permanent. In time, they could add up to something grand.”

    If you want to see grand take a look at a 200 year journal or better yet a piece of parchment written in 1776. Now wouldn’t that look better and be more impressive on an LCD screen?

  2. I have to agree with Art. I have a box full of journals that go back over 25 years. While some of the entries have faded (rule #1, don’t use pencil) the vast majority are legible.

    Compare these to my electronic memos/notes from the same time frame, which reside on 3.5 inch floppies–now essentially non-accessible unless you can find legacy hardware. Oh, and a wordprocessor capable of reading the data.

    Despite my addiction to handheld devices (yes, I was one who purchased the original Newton, owned a Rex Pro, have had every version of Palm Pilot and now carry an iPod touch), I still keep a paper journal. Guess you’ll just have to pry mine from my cold, dead…. :-)

  3. I second Niko’s remarks.

    Digital is fine if actively managed (file error prevention, data backups constantly, continual hardware/software upgrades and converting of files to new formats).

    But, old digital diaries often are not actively managed. Some are only online, and vulnerable if the free journal sites close down. Others are stored locally, making them go down with a computer crash.

    Old books or photographs are far more touching to hold in your hands than digital copies. Imagine holding a 100-200 page diary of your ancestors in your hand. It would not have the same effect to look at scans of that diary in an e-mail attachment. With paper diaries and photos, they age and are (sometimes) passed generation to generation. Your great-great grandkids don’t need to find some old floppy drive or try to understand how you organized your digital files. They don’t have to worry about backing up your digital files. They can pull out a shoebox of journals, and hold the very books you have held and written in. Digital can’t replace this aspect of paper.

    Paper has stood the test of time. Only time will tell if digital will.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.